- Sponsored:
-
USD 0.00
- Contributions:
- Followers:
-
3
| Topic expertise (All) | Rank |
|---|---|
| Confidential topic | 1 |
| Confidential topic | 2 |
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Last warning:
Ganghu, you voted against the true outcome of a question this competition as entered and certified, without giving a reason. This is against the Regulations of Prediki. What is the explanation for this? We reserve the right to disqualify you for obstructing the market.https://www.prediki.com/questions/Confidential-Pr…
...more- 8 years ago
- Reply
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
-
Confidential questionMessage for a confidential question ...more
- 8 years ago
Ganghu Liu has 3 followers.
Thanks you for explaining your thoughts. Everybody at Prediki appreciates your sense that traditional questionnaire surveys are are often misleading.
That said, a settlement proposal on Prediki must strictly follow the question's rule. The rule envisages to use the result of a GTM survey, which we did, including the provision of a chart in the wiki. Every participant - including you - accepted the rule before entering. Therefore, the outcome of GTM questionnaire must be voted yes.
Based on your explanation we revoke the warning, emphasising the need to observe the formal rules.
...more